My reaction to this article is that they are most certainly right about losers and winners. I'm not judging them but we tend to learn from losers like what they are doing wrong so that we can make improvements. This article sends a message out there to all people; it tells you we need people in these loser jobs than we need people in the winner’s cycle. Most losers are unemployed and we need that for our system to work. I don’t believe anyone would notice if people quit working for a month even though they are making billions of dollars. I just don’t think people care enough now days.

There would be total chaos if people quit working, we would all be unemployed with no job and no money so then what would you do? You see why we need only few to be unemployed, not everyone need to be employed. What would happen to banks? You don’t know how much of this can be a danger to citizens.

When the unemployment is up they pay lower wages which is true but why would you pay lower instead of higher? I wonder, well you can be a loser even if you are employed. You don’t have to be unemployed. I don’t understand people today with all this chaos running around and spreading the word.

We need to keep people on track because lots of things could happen such as the economy can slow down, people will lose their jobs, wages will be gone, savings are evaporating with inflation, and savers become losers. Our whole entire system depends on losers. Don’t forget that ever because winners mean nothing. To live in a place where lots of people have nothing to lose can be very, highly dangerous for all of us.